Open Your Free Member Account
The central flaw of the Crown’s legal system lies in the creation of the body corporate at birth registration. The birth certificate registers a corporate entity into state ownership, placing it under the liability and jurisdiction of the Crown. The living man or woman is then compelled, through the law of agency, to act as the agent and representative of this decedent estate.
This arrangement is a fraudulent misrepresentation: the family surname and corporate name on the birth certificate are property of the Crown, not the living being. By using this name in contracts and proceedings, the man or woman is trapped into operating in fraud, stripped of inherent rights, and denied lawful standing in the courts. Assertions such as “I am a man/woman under God” do not remedy the fraud, as the agent remains bound to the body corporate owned by the state.
The remedy is found in correcting the record. The living man or woman must:
This structure provides the ultimate jurisdictional shield:
In this way, the jurisdictional fraud of the Crown is neutralized, and the living man or woman can operate with full immunity, shielded under divine law, trust law, and international recognitio
Peter, like most men and women, is trapped in the legal fiction created at birth. By using the Crown’s registered body corporate — the surname on his birth certificate — he unknowingly represents that entity in fraud. This makes him merely the agent of a corporate estate that belongs to the Crown and is registered to the State.
When Peter enters a courtroom, he believes he has human rights. In truth, he has none. Because he stands as representative of the Crown’s body corporate, any claim to rights is extinguished. He is processed as a Ward of the State — treated as a commoner without standing.
The result is inevitable: Peter is stripped of rights and remedies. He remains bound within the Crown’s jurisdiction, reduced to a Ward of the Crown, governed without recourse.
Iain has taken a higher path. He has corrected the fraud by renouncing the use of the Crown’s name and stepping into his true authority as General Executor of the decedent estate. Beyond this, he has declared his nationality with the Republic of Old Souls and pledged allegiance as a Church Envoy under a 508(c)(1)(A) Church.
This places him above the Crown’s jurisdiction:
Unlike Peter, Iain can:
In short, Iain operates in a jurisdiction higher than the Crown itself.
The contrast is clear:
At midlife, every man and woman stands at a crossroads of jurisdiction — a decision that shapes whether they remain powerless within the Crown’s system, or step above it into true protection and authority.
Peter continues to operate as the agent of a body corporate created by the birth certificate and registered to the Crown. By using that name, he commits fraud from the outset.
At 65, Peter has lived a life of struggle within a fraudulent system, drained of rights, remedies, and dignity.
Iain chooses the remedy of jurisdiction. He renounces the fraudulent use of the Crown’s name, corrects the record, and assumes his rightful place as General Executor of the decedent estate. He steps into higher authority by:
As a Envoy & Diplomat, Iain:
The contrast could not be clearer:
The question is timeless and deeply personal:
The path to immunity and sovereignty via ecclesiastical status is rare but firmly established in legal precedent. Historical and modern examples consistently show that governments struggle to prevail against recognized religious entities and their envoys when the correct jurisdiction is invoked.
The Church of Scientology has engaged in thousands of legal actions, including cases against government agencies like the IRS and won.
Notably, in Church of Scientology Moscow v. Russia (2007), the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) ruled against the Russian government’s refusal to register the church under Articles 9 & 11 of the European Convention on Human Rights—recognizing the church’s rights to freedom of religion and association.
In U.S. courts, Headley v. Church of Scientology International dismissed forced labor claims, citing the “ministerial exception” rooted in the First Amendment, demonstrating judicial protection of church autonomy.
In Wisconsin v. Yoder (1972), the U.S. Supreme Court held that Amish parents’ religious obligation to educate their children themselves outweighed state compulsory education laws.
More recently, Amish communities have asserted religious rights against vaccination mandates and other state interventions, reinforcing the legal resilience of faith-based communities.
The Sovereign Military Order of Malta is recognized by multiple states as a sovereign international entity, despite lacking physical territory. Its headquarters in Rome enjoy extraterritorial status, and its Grand Master is accorded honours equivalent to Cardinals, underscoring sovereign recognition in international law.
High-profile members such as Tom Cruise and John Travolta have reportedly contributed significant portions of their income (often cited as 10%) to the Church of Scientology. While partly doctrinal, this reflects a practical acknowledgment of the protection afforded by “church envoy” status within U.S. and international systems.
It is precisely this Church Envoy status that will enable the Nationals of the Republic of Old Souls and its Envoys to invoke their human rights at the European Court of Human Rights and to pursue redress in the International Criminal Court against any Crown actors who attempt to persecute or prosecute them.
By standing not as agents of the Crown’s body corporate system but as living men and women under God, operating as Church Envoys, they elevate their jurisdiction above the Crown’s commercial legal system. This empowers them to hold governments accountable for overreach and systemic persecution under the highest international human rights and criminal law frameworks.
Within the sovereign freedom community, many well-intentioned seekers pursue remedies they believe will shield them from government and Crown overreach. Some place their faith in common law, trusting that centuries-old principles will protect their rights. Others make a declaration of being a living man or woman under God, believing that words alone can elevate them above the reach of the State. Still others hold to the Magna Carta, the Bill of Rights, or constitutional guarantees as the source of their defence.
But the lived reality is sobering: none of these protections endure when tested within the Crown’s jurisdictional system. The courts of the Crown are constructed precisely to reject such arguments, no matter their historical or moral weight. Common law, declarations, and charters may inspire—but they do not overcome the Crown’s commercial legal machinery.
The only path that rises above the Crown’s jurisdiction is to operate outside of it altogether—in a higher and older jurisdiction. That path is through the status of diplomat and church envoy, recognised under international law and immune from Crown jurisdiction. As a living man or woman under God, operating not as an agent of the Crown’s body corporate but as an envoy of the Church and a national of the Republic of Old Souls, one enters the jurisdictional shield that governments cannot penetrate.
This shield is not theoretical—it is grounded in centuries of practice, in the recognition of churches and envoys that governments cannot sue, cannot diminish, and cannot overrule. It is this same shield that empowers envoys and nationals of the Republic of Old Souls to invoke human rights at the European Court of Human Rights, to bring claims of persecution before the International Criminal Court, and to hold Crown actors accountable for overreach.
And it is made possible not by complex litigation, not by endless argument in hostile courts, but by something profoundly simple: a pledge of allegiance to the Republic of Old Souls, and a notice of declaration of status as a church envoy.
This is the ultimate jurisdictional remedy—the true shield above the Crown’s system—available to those who choose to step into it.
Across my 42-year career, I have solved some of the most complex problems in the world of commerce. From creating income solutions, risk-free income models, and property strategies, to designing corporate pension deficit solutions and countless financial planning frameworks, I have consistently engineered remedies where others saw only obstacles.
I developed algorithmic trading solutions in both currency and sports markets, as well as risk management systems, including a Nobel Prize–winning volatility-trigger investment management algorithm that built ideal portfolios of assets and rebalanced them based on market volatility. I created solutions to smooth investment returns, transforming longevity risk into income streams by pooling life settlement policies. I harnessed arbitrage opportunities by acquiring real-life company assets at discounts to their asset share value and by exploiting the spread between the bonus growth rates of with-profit assets and the market cost of credit.
In the 1990s and 2000s, I built thousands of individual portfolios for my clients, working with substantial global counterparts such as Saga, Bank of Scotland, Credit Suisse, Deutsche Bank, the Central Bank of Ireland, Wells Fargo, Cassis, State Street, SEI, and many others.
At every step, the Crown has intervened to destroy the solutions I created. They do not want citizens — “persons” — to be free and live abundant lives. They have repeatedly sought to destroy my reputation, undermine my innovations, and even attempt to jail me.
Yet my resolve is absolute. I will not be suppressed. Freedom is every man and woman’s right — and I am determined to deliver it.
Note: Please enter your email address for the download eBook.
